An former Florida Education Commissioner Tony Bennett made in 2012 while the elected superintendent of Hoosier State schools were 鈥減lausible鈥� and 鈥渃onsistently applied鈥� to all schools.
Indiana lawmakers requested the review showing Bennett and his staff discussing how to change the school grading formula. The emails showed Bennett was concerned about the formula after a prominent charter school, Christel House Academy, initially earned a 鈥楥鈥� grade. The school earned an 鈥楢鈥� grade after the changes.
, just days after the initial Associated Press story. Bennett said he had done nothing wrong, but did not want to be a distraction.
The Indiana report backs his claims, though does note the Indiana Department of Education needed to be more transparent and work more closely with lawmakers and the governor. In addition, the report found the departure of key staff members were a factor in a lack of quality control prior to releasing the school grades.
鈥淭he two adjustments administered to determine Christel House鈥檚 final grade were plausible,鈥� John Grew and William Sheldrake, the report鈥檚 authors, wrote, 鈥渁nd the treatment afforded to the school was consistently applied to other schools with similar circumstances.鈥�
The report also found that educators did not believe the grading formula accurately or fairly represented a school鈥檚 performance, or treated different school types 鈥� public, private, charter 鈥� equally and fairly.
Bennett said he felt vindicated by the report.
鈥淭he report clearly shows that accusations of manipulation of the A-F system for a single school are false and malicious,鈥� he said in a statement. 鈥淵ou will remember that when the Department of Education released school grades last year, I said the process was imperfect and could be improved greatly. Still, it is a far better measurement and accountability tool for our schools than has ever been used in our state.鈥�
The report did not examine the political motivations of Bennett and his staff for making the changes.
The report recommends a number of changes to Indiana鈥檚 school grading formula, many of which might be considered .
They include:
- Working more closely with lawmakers and the governor to explain changes to the grading system.
- Bringing in more outside experts for advice.
- Be more open and transparent about changes to the formula.
- Simplify the school grading system.
- Put less emphasis on the percentage of students meeting state goals on tests 鈥� also known as proficiency 鈥� and more emphasis on the improvement of student scores from one year to the next.
- Add measures other than test scores to the formula.
- Pilot test any new formula for a year.
Many of the recommendations StateImpact Florida .
Copyright 2020 WUSF Public Media - WUSF 89.7. To see more, visit . 9(MDAyNDY5MjM1MDEyODE2MzMyMTZmZDQwMg001))
