港澳天下彩

漏 2024 WLRN
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Ambulances Stick Patients With Surprise Bills

Wikimedia Commons

One patient got a $3,660 bill for a 4-mile ride. Another was charged $8,460 for a trip from one hospital that could not handle his case to another that could. Still another found herself marooned at an out-of-network hospital, where she鈥檇 been taken by ambulance without her consent.

These patients all took ambulances in emergencies and got slammed with unexpected bills. Public outrage has erupted over surprise medical bills 鈥 generally out-of-network charges that a patient did not expect or could not control 鈥 prompting   to pass laws protecting consumers in some situations. But these laws largely ignore ground ambulance rides, which can leave patients stuck with hundreds or even thousands of dollars in bills, with few options for recourse, finds a Kaiser Health News review of 350 consumer complaints in 32 states.

Patients usually choose to go to the doctor, but they are vulnerable when they call 911 鈥 or get into an ambulance. The dispatcher picks the ambulance crew, which, in turn, often picks the hospital. Moreover, many ambulances are not summoned by patients. Instead, the crew arrives at the scene having heard about an accident on a scanner, or because police or a bystander called 911.

Betsy Imholz, special projects director at the Consumers Union, which has collected over 700 patient stories about surprise medical bills, said at least a quarter concern ambulances.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a huge problem,鈥 she said.

Forty years ago, most ambulances were free for patients, provided by volunteers or town fire departments using taxpayer money, said Jay Fitch, president of Fitch & Associates, an emergency services consulting firm. Today, ambulances are increasingly run by private companies and  . Ambulance providers now often charge by the mile and sometimes for each 鈥渟ervice,鈥 like providing oxygen. If the ambulance is staffed by paramedics rather than emergency medical technicians, that will result in a higher charge 鈥 even if the patient didn鈥檛 need paramedic-level services. Charges range widely from zero to thousands of dollars, depending on billing practices.

The core of the problem is that ambulance and private insurance companies often can鈥檛 agree on a fair price, so the ambulance service doesn鈥檛 join the insurance network. That leaves patients stuck in the middle with out-of-network charges that are not negotiated, Imholz said.

This happens to patients frequently, according to  of over half a million ambulance trips taken by patients with private insurance in 2014. The study found that 26 percent of these trips were billed on an out-of-network basis.

That figure is 鈥渜uite jarring,鈥 said Loren Adler, associate director for the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative and co-author of  .

The KHN review of complaints revealed two common scenarios leaving patients in debt: First, patients get in an ambulance after a 911 call. Second, an ambulance transfers them between hospitals. In both scenarios, patients later learn the fee is much higher because the ambulance was out-of-network, and after their insurer pays what it deems fair, they get a surprise bill for the balance, also known as a 鈥渂alance bill.鈥

The Better Business Bureau has received nearly 1,200 consumer complaints about ambulances in the past three years; half were related to billing, and 46 mentioned out-of-network charges, spokeswoman Katherine Hutt said.

While the federal government sets reimbursement rates for patients on Medicare and Medicaid, it does not regulate ambulance fees for patients with private insurance. In the absence of federal rules, those patients are left with a fragmented system in which the cost of a similar ambulance ride can vary widely from town to town. There are about 14,000 ambulance services across the country, run by governments, volunteers, hospitals and private companies, according to the American Ambulance Association.

For a glimpse into the unpredictable, fragmented system, consider the case of Roman Barshay. The 46-year-old software engineer, who lives in Brooklyn, N.Y., was visiting friends in the Boston suburb of Chestnut Hill last November when he took a nasty fall.

Barshay felt a sharp pain in his chest and back and had trouble walking. An ambulance crew responded to a 911 call at the house and drove him 4 miles to Brigham and Women鈥檚 Hospital, taking his blood pressure as he lay down in the back. Doctors there determined he had sprained tendons and ligaments and a bruised foot, and released him after about four hours, he said.

After Barshay returned to Brooklyn, he got a bill totaling $3,660 鈥 which is $915 for each mile of the ambulance ride. His insurance had paid nearly half, leaving him to pay the remaining $1,890.50.

鈥淚 thought it was a mistake,鈥 Barshay said.

But Fallon Ambulance Service, a private company, was out-of-network for his UnitedHealthcare insurance plan.

鈥淭he cost is outrageous,鈥 said Barshay, who reluctantly paid the $1,890.50 after Fallon sent it to a collection agency. If he had known what the ride would cost, he said, he would at least have been able to refuse and 鈥渃rawl to the hospital myself.鈥

鈥淵ou feel horribly to send a patient a bill like that,鈥 said Peter Racicot, senior vice president of Fallon, a family-owned company based outside Boston.

But ambulance companies are 鈥渟everely underfunded鈥 by Medicare and Medicaid, Racicot said, so Fallon must balance the books by charging higher rates for patients with private insurance.

Racicot said his company has not contracted with Barshay鈥檚 insurer because they couldn鈥檛 agree on a fair rate. When insurers and ambulance companies can鈥檛 agree, he said, 鈥渦nfortunately, the subscribers wind up in the middle.鈥

It鈥檚 also unrealistic to expect EMTs and paramedics at the scene of an emergency to determine whether the company takes a patient鈥檚 insurance, Racicot added.

Ambulance services have to charge enough to subsidize the cost of keeping crews ready around-the-clock even if no calls come in, said Fitch, the ambulance consultant. In a third of the cases where an ambulance crew answers a call, he added, they end up not transporting anyone and the company typically isn鈥檛 reimbursed for the trip.

In part, Barshay had bad luck. If the injury had happened just a mile away inside Boston city limits, he could have ridden a city ambulance, which would have charged $1,490, according to Boston EMS, a sum that his insurer probably would have covered in full.

Very few states have laws limiting ambulance charges, and most state laws that protect patients from surprise billing do not apply to ground ambulance rides, according to attorney Brian Werfel, consultant to the American Ambulance Association. And none of the state surprise-billing protections applies to people with self-funded employer-sponsored health insurance plans, which are regulated only by federal law.  That鈥檚 a huge exception:   of privately insured employees are covered by self-funded employer-sponsored plans.

Some towns that hire private companies to respond to 911 calls may regulate fees or prohibit balance billing, Werfel said, but each locality is different.

Insurance companies try to protect patients from balance billing by negotiating rates with ambulance companies, said Cathryn Donaldson, spokeswoman for America鈥檚 Health Insurance Plans. But 鈥渟ome ambulance companies have been resistant to join plan networks鈥 when insurance companies offer Medicare-based rates, she said.

Medicare rates vary widely by geographic area. On average, ambulance services make a small profit on Medicare payments,   by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. If a patient uses a basic life support ambulance in an emergency, in an urban area, for instance, Medicare payments range from $324 to $453, plus $7.29 per mile. Medicaid rates tend to be significantly lower.

There鈥檚 evidence of 鈥渨aste and fraud鈥 in the ambulance industry, Donaldson added, citing   from the Office of Inspector General at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The report concluded Medicare paid over $50 million in improper ambulance bills, including for supposedly emergency-level transport that ended at a nursing home, not a hospital. One in 5 ambulance services had 鈥渜uestionable billing practices,鈥 the report found.

Most complaints reviewed by Kaiser Health News did not appear to involve fraudulent charges. Instead, patients got caught in a system in which ambulance services can legally charge thousands of dollars for a single trip 鈥 even when the trip starts at an in-network hospital.

That鈥檚 what happened to Devin Hall, a 67-year-old retired postal inspector in Northern California. While he faces stage 3 prostate cancer, Hall is also fighting a $7,109.70 out-of-network ambulance bill from American Medical Response, the nation鈥檚 largest ambulance provider.

On Dec. 27, 2016, Hall went to a local hospital with rectal bleeding. Since the hospital didn鈥檛 have the right specialist to treat his symptoms, it arranged for an ambulance ride to another hospital about 20 miles away. Even though the hospital was in-network, the ambulance was not.

Hall was stunned to see that AMR billed $8,460 for the trip. His federal health plan, the Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, paid $1,350.30 and held Hall responsible for $727.08, records show. The health plan paid that amount because AMR鈥檚 charges exceeded its Medicare-based fee schedule, according to its explanation of benefits. But AMR turned over his case to a debt collector, Credence Resource Management, which sent an Aug. 25 notice seeking the full balance of $7,109.70.

鈥淭hese charges are exorbitant 鈥 I just don鈥檛 think what AMR is doing is right,鈥 said Hall, noting that he had intentionally sought treatment at an in-network hospital.

He has spent months on the phone calling the hospital, his insurer and AMR trying to resolve the matter. Given his prognosis, he worries about leaving his wife with a legal fight and a lien on their Brentwood, Calif., house for a debt they shouldn鈥檛 owe.

After being contacted by Kaiser Health News, AMR said it has pulled Hall鈥檚 case from collections while it reviews the billing. After further review, company spokesman Jason Sorrick said the charges were warranted because it was a 鈥渃ritical care transport, which requires a specialized nurse and equipment on board.鈥

Sorrick faulted Hall鈥檚 health plan for underpaying, and said Hall could receive a discount if he qualifies for AMR鈥檚 鈥渃ompassionate care program鈥 based on his financial and medical situation.

鈥淚n this case, it appears the patient鈥檚 insurance company simply made up a price they wanted to pay,鈥 Sorrick said.

In July, a California law went into effect that protects consumers from surprise medical bills from out-of-network providers, including some ambulance transport between hospitals. But Hall鈥檚 case occurred before that, and the state law doesn鈥檛 apply to his federal insurance plan.

The consumer complaints reviewed by Kaiser Health News reveal a wide variety of ways that patients are left fighting big bills:路         An older patient in California said debt collectors called incessantly, including on Sunday mornings and at night, demanding an extra $500 on top of the $1,000 that his insurance had paid for an ambulance trip.

路         Two ambulance services responded to a New Jersey man鈥檚 911 call when he felt burning in his chest. One charged him $2,100 for treating him on the scene for less than 30 minutes 鈥 even though he never rode in that company鈥檚 ambulance.

路         A woman who rolled over in her Jeep in Texas received a bill for a $26,400 鈥渢rauma activation fee鈥 鈥 a fee triggered when the ambulance service called ahead to the emergency department to assemble a trauma team. The woman, who did not require trauma care, fought the hospital to get the fee waived.

In other cases, patients face financial hardship when ambulances take them to out-of-network hospitals. Patients don鈥檛 always have a choice in where to seek care; that鈥檚 up to the ambulance crew and depends on the protocols written by the medical director of each ambulance service, said Werfel, the ambulance association consultant.

Sarah Wilson, a 36-year-old microbiologist, had a seizure at her grandmother鈥檚 house in rural Ohio on March 18, 2016, the day after having hip surgery at Akron City Hospital. When her husband called 911, the private ambulance crew that responded refused to take her back to Akron City Hospital, instead driving her to an out-of-network hospital that was 22 miles closer. Wilson refused care because the hospital was out-of-network, she said. Wilson wanted to leave. But 鈥淚 was literally trapped in my stretcher,鈥 without the crutches she needed to walk, she said. Her husband, who had followed by car, wasn鈥檛 allowed to see her right away. She ended up leaving against medical advice at 4 a.m. She landed in collections for a $202 hospital bill for a medical examination, which damaged her credit score, she said.

Ken Joseph, chief paramedic of Emergency Medical Transport Inc., the private ambulance company that transported Wilson, said company protocol is to take patients to the 鈥渃losest appropriate facility.鈥 Serving a wide rural area with just two ambulances, the company has to get each ambulance back to its station quickly so it can be ready for the next call, he said.

Patients like Wilson are often left to battle these bills alone, because there are no federal protections for patients with private insurance.

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who has been pushing for  protecting patients from surprise hospital bills, said in a statement that he supports doing the same for ambulance bills.

Meanwhile, patients do have the right to refuse an ambulance ride, as long as they are over 18 and mentally capable.

鈥淵ou could just take an Uber,鈥 said Adler, of the Schaeffer Initiative. But if you need an ambulance, there鈥檚 little recourse to avoid surprise bills, he said, 鈥渙ther than yelling at the insurance company after the fact, or yelling at the ambulance company.鈥

Copyright 2020 Health News Florida. To see more, visit .

Kaiser Health News
More On This Topic