TALLAHASSEE 鈥� Municipalities and dozens of local elected officials from across Florida filed state and federal lawsuits Thursday challenging the constitutionality of a new law that requires the officials to disclose detailed information about their personal finances.
The lawsuits, filed in Leon County circuit court and federal court in South Florida, contend that the disclosure requirement violates privacy rights under the Florida Constitution and First Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution.
The law, passed during the 2023 legislative session, requires mayors and other elected municipal officials, such as members of city councils, to file annual reports detailing issues such as their net worths, incomes and assets. Other elected officials, such as the governor and state legislators, have long faced such requirements.
READ MORE: Miami-Dade school board tightens oversight of spending following arrest of former member
The new law has caused an uproar among local governments, with more than 100 municipal officials resigning because of it, according to the Weiss Serota Helfman Cole + Bierman law firm, which filed the lawsuits.
鈥淩equiring that uncompensated (or minimally compensated) municipal elected officials disclose their precise net worth, income and assets does not serve (let alone constitute the least restrictive means of serving) any compelling interest,鈥� the lawsuit filed in Leon County said.
The lawsuits name as defendants members of the Florida Commission on Ethics, which administers and enforces disclosure laws. Plaintiffs in the lawsuits include officials and communities ranging from Miami Springs to Destin.
In the past, municipal officials were required to file what is known as a 鈥淔orm 1,鈥� which provided less-detailed financial information. The law requires them to file a more-detailed 鈥淔orm 6鈥� by July 1. It applies to officials who were in their positions on Jan. 1 and also will apply to candidates for municipal offices, according to the lawsuits.
Supporters of detailed disclosure requirements say, in part, that such information can help show officials鈥� potential conflicts of interest while conducting government business.
But the lawsuits contend that the new requirement is not the 鈥渓east restrictive鈥� way to accomplish such goals.
鈥淔orcing municipal elected officials and municipal candidates to publicly make such statements impairs their right to be free of government-compelled, content-based, non-commercial speech, in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution,鈥� the federal lawsuit said.
The lawsuit filed in Leon County, meanwhile, said 鈥渢he right to privacy is a fundamental right within Florida鈥檚 Constitution.鈥�
鈥淔orcing municipal elected officials and candidates to publicly disclose such private information impairs their right to privacy under the Florida Constitution,鈥� the circuit-court lawsuit said. 鈥淏ecause the right to privacy is enumerated as a fundamental right, any such impairment is impermissible unless it is the least restrictive means of achieving a compelling state interest.鈥�
Both lawsuits seek injunctions against the requirement.
