Democratic U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other top House Democrats are holding a congressional field hearing on Tuesday morning in Broward County to talk about 鈥渢he escalating threat to reproductive freedom.鈥�
The hearing comes a day after Florida鈥檚 Supreme Court cleared the way for the state to ban abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and gave the green light to a allow Florida voters decide whether to protect abortion rights.
The Democrats are being led by Wasserman Schultz, D-Weston, and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.
Scheduled to testify before the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee: U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra.
鈥淭his hearing is an essential step in our ongoing commitment to safeguarding reproductive freedom,鈥� said Wasserman Schultz in a statement. 鈥淲e cannot ignore the relentless assault on women's healthcare rights. It's imperative that we come together to confront these challenges head-on.鈥�
Others expected to testify will be 鈥淔loridians and stakeholders directly impacted by attacks on reproductive freedom,鈥� according to a statement issued by Wasserman Schutz鈥檚 congressional office.
The hearing will be held at the Broward County Government Center, 115 S. Andrews Ave., Fort Lauderdale. It will be .
Late Monday afternoon, the Florida Supreme Court issued two key rulings on the abortion, which ensures that the contentious topic will almost certainly dominate debate leading up to the November presidential, congressional and state legislation election.
In one decision, the judges ruled 6-1 to uphold the state's ban on most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, meaning a ban on six weeks could soon take effect. But under a separate 4-3 ruling, a ballot measure to go to voters that would enshrine abortion rights in Florida's constitution.
The 15-week ban, has been enforced while it was challenged in court. The six-week ban, passed by the Legislature last year, was written so that it would not take effect until a month after the 2022 law was upheld.
Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union and others challenged the law in court. They argued the Florida Constitution鈥檚 unique privacy clause for more than 40 years has explicitly protected a right to abortion in the state and should remain in force.
Lawyers for the state, however, said when the privacy clause was adopted by voter referendum in 1980, few people understood it would cover abortion. They told the justices the clause was mainly meant to cover 鈥渋nformational privacy鈥� such as personal records and not abortion.
The Florida justices agreed, saying that when voters approved the privacy clause, they didn't know it would affect abortion laws.
The proposed constitutional amendment that will be on the November ballot says 鈥渘o law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient鈥檚 health, as determined by the patient鈥檚 healthcare provider.鈥� It provides for one exception that is already in the state constitution: Parents must be notified before their minor children can get an abortion.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court , most Republican-controlled states have adopted bans or restrictions on abortions. Every ban has faced a court challenge.
A survey of abortion providers conducted for the Society of Family Planning, which advocates for abortion access, found that Florida had the second-largest increase in the total number of abortions provided since Roe v. Wade was overturned. The state鈥檚 data shows that more than 7,700 women from other states received abortions in Florida in 2023.
The Associated Press contributed to this story
